Porsche Boxster (987)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2vsBMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E85)
3.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range582 km362 mi
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,365kg3,009lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 582km362mi Calculated | 579km360mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,329mm170in | 4,091mm161in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,299mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,473mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 has 49 hp more than BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 6.3 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 6.2 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 has more power, BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 582 km 362 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 579 km 360 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 582 km 362 mi | 579 km 360 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 | BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 3 km (2 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























