BMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2vsPontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPontiac GTO
5.7i V8 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score74/100
Pontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V
- Most powerful344 hp257 kW
- Highest torque488 Nm360 lb-ft
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 344hp257kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 488Nm360lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 79.4s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 21.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 208hp/t155kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 455km282mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,113mm162in | 4,800mm189in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,271mm50in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,497mm98in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,516mm60in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 370L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: Power / Torque
- Pontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 21.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 344 hp 257 kW |
Pontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V has 1 hp more than BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and Pontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 5.0 s |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 6.0 s |
Although Pontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V has more power, BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and Pontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | 344 hp 257 kW | 6.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | PontiacGTO5.7i V8 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 344 hp 257 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 455 km 282 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Pontiac GTO 5.7i V8 16V
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 123 Nm more
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























