BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 35ivsBMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
M 3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best practicality score35/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range585 km364 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 62.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 585km364mi Calculated | 455km282mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 4,113mm162in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,271mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,497mm98in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,516mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 245L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 16.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW |
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 has 37 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 37 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5.2 s |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 585 km 364 mi |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 455 km 282 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 585 km 364 mi | 455 km 282 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 35i | BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Has 35 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Has 37 hp more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























