Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6vsBMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z3 M (E36/7)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk165 L
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 67.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 536km333mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,010mm158in | 4,025mm158in |
| Width | 1,715mm68in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,269mm50in | 1,268mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,459mm97in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,477mm58in | 1,492mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 348L | 165L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 6,100 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 325 hp 242 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 has 29 hp more than BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 5.2 s |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 536 km 333 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























