Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6vsBMW X7 (G07) M50d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
M50d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Lightest1,910 kg4,211 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk488 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best practicality score84/100
BMW X7 (G07) M50d
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions193 g/km
- Best estimated range1,081 km672 mi
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 760Nm561lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Gross weight | 2,580kg5,688lb | 3,290kg7,253lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.7s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 85.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s | 21.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 1,081km672mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,894cc177cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,609mm63in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | 1,650mm65in | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,658mm65in | 1,703mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 488L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,503L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 218g/km | 193g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) M50d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 5,200-6,700 rpm | 1,750-5,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 21.0 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 400 hp 298 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) M50d has 20 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6 and BMW X7 (G07) M50d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 4.9 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 5.4 s |
Although BMW X7 (G07) M50d has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6 and BMW X7 (G07) M50d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50d and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 677 km 421 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 1,081 km 672 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 4.9 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2018GTS 2.9 V6 | BMWX7 (G07)M50d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 1,081 km 672 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 218 g/km | 193 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 488 L 17.2 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6 | BMW X7 (G07) M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 GTS 2.9 V6
- Is 550 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 162 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X7 (G07) M50d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 240 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 404 km (251 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























