BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) M50dvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar
P 380 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X7 (G07) M50d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions193 g/km
- Best estimated range1,081 km672 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6
- Lightest1,884 kg4,154 lb
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t150 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk673 L
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 1,884kg4,154lb |
| Gross weight | 3,290kg7,253lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 202hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,081km672mi Calculated | 670km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,032mm80in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,703mm67in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | 214g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X7 (G07) M50d: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) M50d has 20 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6 and BMW X7 (G07) M50d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50d and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50d and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 1,081 km 672 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 670 km 416 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.7 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 380 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,081 km 672 mi | 670 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | 214 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) M50d | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) M50d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 310 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 411 km (255 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 380 3.0 V6
- Is 576 kg lighter
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 347 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























