BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) M50dvsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 P400 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
P400 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X7 (G07) M50d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions193 g/km
- Best estimated range1,081 km672 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 P400 3.0
- Lightest2,267 kg4,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight176 hp/t132 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,694 L
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,267kg4,998lb |
| Gross weight | 3,290kg7,253lb | 3,140kg6,923lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 86.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 29.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,081km672mi Calculated | 920km572mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 5,000mm197in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,869mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,703mm67in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 1,694L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | 1,943L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | 216g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X7 (G07) M50d: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 P400 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 29.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 2,267 kg 4,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50d and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 P400 3.0: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50d and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 P400 3.0: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 176 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 1,081 km 672 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 920 km 572 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 400 hp 298 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50d | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | 176 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)M50d | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 2017P400 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb | 2,267 kg 4,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,081 km 672 mi | 920 km 572 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | 216 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 1,694 L 59.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) M50d | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 P400 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) M50d
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 P400 3.0
- Is 193 kg lighter
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1,368 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























