BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) 40ivsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
3.0 P360
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque495 Nm365 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,130 km702 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best practicality score93/100
BMW X7 (G07) 40i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)40i | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 495Nm365lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,375kg5,236lb |
| Gross weight | 3,155kg6,956lb | 3,170kg6,989lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 89.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 44.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 922km573mi Calculated | 1,130km702mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,998cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 3,122mm123in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,705mm67in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | 2,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 205g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X7 (G07) 40i: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)40i | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 44.7 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 has 20 hp more than BMW X7 (G07) 40i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X7 (G07) 40i and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 495 Nm 365 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 2,375 kg 5,236 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 6.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 7.1 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 has more power, BMW X7 (G07) 40i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X7 (G07) 40i and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 922 km 573 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 1,130 km 702 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) 40i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)40i | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 495 Nm 365 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,375 kg 5,236 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 922 km 573 mi | 1,130 km 702 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 205 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) 40i | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) 40i
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 208 km (129 mi) more estimated range
- Has 574 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























