BMW X6 (F16)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (F16) M50dvsJaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
3.0t V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (F16) M50d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions174 g/km
- Best estimated range1,288 km800 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score89/100
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Lightest1,861 kg4,103 lb
- Best power-to-weight204 hp/t152 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (F16)M50d | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 740Nm546lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 1,861kg4,103lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 20.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,288km800mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,909mm193in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,702mm67in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (F16) M50d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (F16)M50d | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 20.3 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
BMW X6 (F16) M50d has 1 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and BMW X6 (F16) M50d: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,861 kg 4,103 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 5.2 s |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) M50d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) M50d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 1,288 km 800 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)M50d | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (F16)M50d | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb | 1,861 kg 4,103 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,288 km 800 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (F16) M50d | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (F16) M50d
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 290 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 580 km (360 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 35 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Is 324 kg lighter
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























