Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6vsBMW X6 (F16) 50i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (F16)
50i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (F16) 50i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions227 g/km
- Best estimated range876 km545 mi
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score81/100
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Lightest2,110 kg4,652 lb
- Best power-to-weight209 hp/t156 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk670 L
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | BMWX6 (F16)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Gross weight | 2,865kg6,316lb | 2,885kg6,360lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.9s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 65.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.5s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 876km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,604cc220cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,688mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,678mm66in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 234g/km | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (F16) 50i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | BMWX6 (F16)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.5 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 450 hp 336 kW |
BMW X6 (F16) 50i has 10 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6 and BMW X6 (F16) 50i: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 5.2 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 850 km 528 mi |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 876 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.2 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)50i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)50i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) 50i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6 | BMWX6 (F16)50i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 876 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 234 g/km | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6 | BMW X6 (F16) 50i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 GTS 3.6 V6
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X6 (F16) 50i
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























