Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDIvsBMW X6 (F16) 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (F16)
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best practicality score88/100
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Lightest2,105 kg4,641 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best estimated range1,349 km838 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,297kg5,064lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Gross weight | 2,960kg6,526lb | 2,820kg6,217lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.2s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 348Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,099km683mi Calculated | 1,349km838mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,134cc252cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,801mm189in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,709mm67in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,893mm114in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,656mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,676mm66in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,642L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 239g/km | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.2 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDI has 27 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 40d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDI: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 2,297 kg 5,064 lb |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 5.8 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 5.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDI: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 1,099 km 683 mi |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 1,349 km 838 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 TDI | BMWX6 (F16)40d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,297 kg 5,064 lb | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,099 km 683 mi | 1,349 km 838 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 239 g/km | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDI | BMW X6 (F16) 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 4.2 V8 TDI
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Is 192 kg lighter
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 250 km (156 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 74 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























