Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsBMW X6 (F16) 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (F16)
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best estimated range1,349 km838 mi
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,820kg6,217lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 1,349km838mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 27 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 40d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.8 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 5.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 1,349 km 838 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | BMWX6 (F16)40d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 1,349 km 838 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 | BMW X6 (F16) 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Has 180 Nm more
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 641 km (399 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























