Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsBMW X6 (F16) 40d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

3.0t V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2016-2017
VS

BMW X6 (F16)

40d

313 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Lightest
    1,820 kg
    4,012 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    187 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Highest torque
    630 Nm
    465 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,349 km
    838 mi
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
340hp254kW
313hp233kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
630Nm465lb-ft
Curb weight
1,820kg4,012lb
2,105kg4,641lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
2,820kg6,217lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
74.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
21.8s
Calculated
24.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
708km440mi
Calculated
1,349km838mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
4,909mm193in
Width
2,070mm81in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,702mm67in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,933mm115in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,706mm67in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
212mm8in
Trunk volume
650L
550L
Max trunk volume-
1,525L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
85L
CO2 emissions
209g/km
165g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6BMW X6 (F16) 40dPowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V66,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWX6 (F16)40d4,400 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6BMWX6 (F16)40d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.8 s
24.2 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
162 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 27 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 40d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 27 hp (20 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
BMWX6 (F16)40d
630 Nm
465 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
1,820 kg
4,012 lb
BMWX6 (F16)40d
2,105 kg
4,641 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
250 km/h
155 mph
BMWX6 (F16)40d
240 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V65.8 s
BMWX6 (F16)40d5.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
708 km
440 mi
BMWX6 (F16)40d
1,349 km
838 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
5.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
5.8 s
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace3.0t V6BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
340 hp
254 kW
313 hp
233 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,820 kg
4,012 lb
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
Fuel consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Range score
708 km
440 mi
1,349 km
838 mi
CO2 score
209 g/km
165 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6BMW X6 (F16) 40d
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Has 27 hp more
  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 641 km (399 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 44 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 vs BMW X6 (F16) 40d - car comparison - FastVsFaster