Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6vsBMW X6 (F16) 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (F16)
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,959 kg4,319 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions167 g/km
- Best estimated range1,031 km641 mi
- Largest trunk673 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score91/100
BMW X6 (F16) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | BMWX6 (F16)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,959kg4,319lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,740kg6,041lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.2s Calculated | 27.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,031km641mi Calculated | 988km614mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,803mm189in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | - | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 673L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,731L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 167g/km | 200g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (F16) 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 5,800-6,400 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | BMWX6 (F16)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.2 s | 27.2 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW X6 (F16) 35i has 6 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6 and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 1,959 kg 4,319 lb |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 6.5 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 35i and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6 and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 1,031 km 641 mi |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 988 km 614 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.5 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)35i |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | BMWX6 (F16)35i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,959 kg 4,319 lb | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,031 km 641 mi | 988 km 614 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 167 g/km | 200 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6 | BMW X6 (F16) 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 66 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
BMW X6 (F16) 35i
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























