BMW X6 (F16)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (F16) 30dvsLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10)
200t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (F16) 30d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range1,417 km880 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Lightest1,810 kg3,990 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk555 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (F16)30d | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,065kg4,553lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | 2,780kg6,129lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 44.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,417km880mi Calculated | 759km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,909mm193in | 4,630mm182in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,702mm67in | 1,645mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 185mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (F16) 30d: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 4,800 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 5,700 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (F16)30d | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 44.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 258 hp 192 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW |
BMW X6 (F16) 30d has 20 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and BMW X6 (F16) 30d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 2,065 kg 4,553 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 6.7 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 30d and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 30d and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 1,417 km 880 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 759 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)30d | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (F16)30d | LexusNX I (AZ10)200t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,065 kg 4,553 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,417 km 880 mi | 759 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (F16) 30d | Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (F16) 30d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 657 km (408 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























