Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2)
Car comparison
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8vsBMW X6 (E71) 50i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (E71)
50i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful477 hp356 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight204 hp/t152 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X6 (E71) 50i
- Lightest2,190 kg4,828 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.7 L/100 km13.3 mpg US16.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range680 km423 mi
- Best economy score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | BMWX6 (E71)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 477hp356kW | 407hp304kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,336kg5,150lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Gross weight | 2,948kg6,499lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.5s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 21.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 554km344mi Calculated | 680km423mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,417cc392cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,859mm191in | 4,877mm192in |
| Width | 1,958mm77in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,756mm69in | 1,690mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,633mm64in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,450L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 93L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 292g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (E71) 50i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | BMWX6 (E71)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 21.1 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 407 hp 304 kW |
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8 has 70 hp more than BMW X6 (E71) 50i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 50i and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 2,336 kg 5,150 lb |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 5.0 s |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8 and BMW X6 (E71) 50i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 50i and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 554 km 344 mi |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 680 km 423 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 407 hp 304 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (E71)50i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 |
| 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (E71)50i |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (E71) 50i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)SRT8 6.4 V8 | BMWX6 (E71)50i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 477 hp 356 kW | 407 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,336 kg 5,150 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 554 km 344 mi | 680 km 423 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 292 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8 | BMW X6 (E71) 50i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.40 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.31 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,410 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT8 6.4 V8
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X6 (E71) 50i
- Is 146 kg lighter
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 126 km (79 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























