BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50dvsMercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GL (X166)
GL 500
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lightest2,225 kg4,905 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500
- Most powerful435 hp324 kW
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score79/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW | 435hp324kW |
| Torque | 740Nm546lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 86.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated | 295Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 870km540mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 4,663cc285cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 5,120mm202in |
| Width | 2,010mm79in | 1,934mm76in |
| Height | 1,766mm70in | 1,850mm73in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,702mm67in | 1,675mm66in |
| Trunk volume | - | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 5,250 rpm | 1,800-3,500 rpm | 6,300 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 435 hp 324 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500 has 54 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 5.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 5.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500 has more power, BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 870 km 540 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 435 hp 324 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 500 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 435 hp 324 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 870 km 540 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d | Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 500
- Has 54 hp more
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























