BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 50ivsBMW X5 (G05 LCI) · Facelift 2023 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (G05 LCI) · Facelift 2023
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful407 hp304 kW
- Lightest2,190 kg4,828 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range952 km592 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 407hp304kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,240kg4,938lb |
| Gross weight | 2,870kg6,327lb | 2,985kg6,581lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 96.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km423mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,935mm194in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 2,004mm79in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,765mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,975mm117in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,677mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,646mm65in | 1,698mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 214mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 292g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 407 hp 304 kW |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 340 hp 254 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i has 67 hp more than BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i: 67 hp (50 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 5.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i: 4.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 680 km 423 mi |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 407 hp 304 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 407 hp 304 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 423 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 292 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i | BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 50i
- Has 67 hp more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 272 km (169 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























