BMW X5 (G05 LCI) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) · Facelift 2023 40dvsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score69/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Lightest2,110 kg4,652 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,240kg4,938lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,985kg6,581lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 29.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,935mm194in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 2,004mm79in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,765mm69in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,975mm117in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,677mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,698mm67in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 214mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,870L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 29.4 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d has 34 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 952 km 592 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202340d | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 40d
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 181 km (112 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























