BMW X5 (E53)
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6isvsBMW X5 (F15) 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Lightest2,105 kg4,641 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score83/100
BMW X5 (F15) 35d
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range904 km562 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | BMWX5 (F15)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,236kg4,930lb |
| Gross weight | 2,685kg5,919lb | 2,903kg6,400lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 101.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 624km388mi Calculated | 904km562mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,619cc282cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,908mm193in |
| Width | 1,872mm74in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 465L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 93L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 5,700 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | BMWX5 (F15)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 347 hp 259 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 255 hp 190 kW |
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is has 92 hp more than BMW X5 (F15) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 35d and BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is: 92 hp (69 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 2,236 kg 4,930 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is and BMW X5 (F15) 35d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 35d and BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is: 5.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 624 km 388 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 904 km 562 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 347 hp 259 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)35d |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (F15) 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)35d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | BMWX5 (F15)35d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | 2,236 kg 4,930 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 624 km 388 mi | 904 km 562 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 465 L 16.4 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is | BMW X5 (F15) 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is
- Has 92 hp more
- Is 131 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 35d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 280 km (174 mi) more estimated range
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























