BMW X5 (E53)
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6isvsBMW X5 (F15) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score83/100
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,271 km790 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Gross weight | 2,685kg5,919lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 116.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 49.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 624km388mi Calculated | 1,271km790mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,619cc282cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,872mm74in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 465L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 93L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 5,700 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 49.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 347 hp 259 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 218 hp 163 kW |
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is has 129 hp more than BMW X5 (F15) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 25d and BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is: 129 hp (96 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 25d and BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is: 9.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 624 km 388 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 1,271 km 790 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 347 hp 259 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 218 hp 163 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E53)4.6is | BMWX5 (F15)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 624 km 388 mi | 1,271 km 790 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 465 L 16.4 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is | BMW X5 (F15) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E53) 4.6is
- Has 129 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 58 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Uses 9.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 647 km (402 mi) more estimated range
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























