BMW X4 M (F98)
Car comparison
BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0vsBMW X6 (G06) M50i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (G06)
M50i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,970 kg4,343 lb
- Best power-to-weight259 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions239 g/km
- Best economy score79/100
BMW X6 (G06) M50i
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range776 km482 mi
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | BMWX6 (G06)M50i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,235kg4,927lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,975kg6,559lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 259hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km385mi Calculated | 776km482mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,758mm187in | 4,935mm194in |
| Width | 1,927mm76in | 2,004mm79in |
| Height | 1,620mm64in | 1,696mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,864mm113in | 2,975mm117in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,678mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | 1,698mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 580L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,430L | 1,530L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 239g/km | 243g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (G06) M50i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,600-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | BMWX6 (G06)M50i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 16.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 530 hp 395 kW |
BMW X6 (G06) M50i has 20 hp more than BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0 and BMW X6 (G06) M50i: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 4.1 s |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 4.3 s |
Although BMW X6 (G06) M50i has more power, BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0 and BMW X6 (G06) M50i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 619 km 385 mi |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 776 km 482 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (G06)M50i | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX4 M (F98)Competition 3.0 | BMWX6 (G06)M50i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 385 mi | 776 km 482 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 239 g/km | 243 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0 | BMW X6 (G06) M50i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X4 M (F98) Competition 3.0
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X6 (G06) M50i
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 157 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























