BMW Z4 (G29)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (G29) M40ivsBMW X4 (G02) M40i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 (G02)
M40i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions168 g/km
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
BMW X4 (G02) M40i
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Best estimated range802 km499 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | BMWX4 (G02)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 703km437mi Calculated | 802km499mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,998cc183cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,324mm170in | 4,752mm187in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,304mm51in | 1,621mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,864mm113in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,589mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 281L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,430L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 185g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (G29) M40i: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 (G02) M40i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 5,200-6,500 rpm | 1,850-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | BMWX4 (G02)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 360 hp 268 kW |
BMW X4 (G02) M40i has 20 hp more than BMW Z4 (G29) M40i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and BMW X4 (G02) M40i: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 4.5 s |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 4.8 s |
Although BMW X4 (G02) M40i has more power, BMW Z4 (G29) M40i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and BMW X4 (G02) M40i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and BMW X4 (G02) M40i: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 703 km 437 mi |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 802 km 499 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40i | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | BMWX4 (G02)M40i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 703 km 437 mi | 802 km 499 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 185 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (G29) M40i | BMW X4 (G02) M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X4 (G02) M40i
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 244 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























