BMW X4 (F26)
Car comparison
BMW X4 (F26) M40ivsBMW X5 (F15) M50d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
M50d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (F15) M50d
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions177 g/km
- Best estimated range1,269 km788 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score82/100
BMW X4 (F26) M40i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Best power-to-weight204 hp/t152 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX4 (F26)M40i | BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 1,269km788mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,901mm75in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,702mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 177g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X4 (F26) M40i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) M50d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 5,800-6,000 rpm | 1,350-5,250 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX4 (F26)M40i | BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 360 hp 268 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
BMW X5 (F15) M50d has 21 hp more than BMW X4 (F26) M40i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X4 (F26) M40i and BMW X5 (F15) M50d: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 4.9 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 5.3 s |
Although BMW X5 (F15) M50d has more power, BMW X4 (F26) M40i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X4 (F26) M40i and BMW X5 (F15) M50d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (F15) M50d and BMW X4 (F26) M40i: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 779 km 484 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 1,269 km 788 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.3 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (F15) M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)M40i | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX4 (F26)M40i | BMWX5 (F15)M50d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 1,269 km 788 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 177 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X4 (F26) M40i | BMW X5 (F15) M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X4 (F26) M40i
- Is 425 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (F15) M50d
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 275 Nm more
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 490 km (304 mi) more estimated range
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























