BMW X4 (F26)
Car comparison
BMW X4 (F26) 35ivsBMW X5 (F15) 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X4 (F26) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,815 kg4,001 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range807 km502 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score85/100
BMW X5 (F15) 35i
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX4 (F26)35i | BMWX5 (F15)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 2,123kg4,680lb |
| Gross weight | 2,405kg5,302lb | 2,753kg6,069lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.6s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 92.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 39.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 807km502mi Calculated | 759km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,908mm193in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X4 (F26) 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 5,800-6,400 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 5,800-6,000 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX4 (F26)35i | BMWX5 (F15)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 39.5 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 300 hp 224 kW |
BMW X4 (F26) 35i has 6 hp more than BMW X5 (F15) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (F15) 35i and BMW X4 (F26) 35i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 2,123 kg 4,680 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X4 (F26) 35i and BMW X5 (F15) 35i: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X4 (F26) 35i and BMW X5 (F15) 35i: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 807 km 502 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 759 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.5 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)35i |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X4 (F26) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (F26)35i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)35i | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX4 (F26)35i | BMWX5 (F15)35i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 2,123 kg 4,680 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 807 km 502 mi | 759 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X4 (F26) 35i | BMW X5 (F15) 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X4 (F26) 35i
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 308 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 35i
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























