BMW X4 (G02)
Car comparison
BMW X4 (G02) M40dvsBMW X4 (F26) 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 (F26)
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X4 (G02) M40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,153 km716 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score76/100
BMW X4 (F26) 35d
- Lightest1,860 kg4,101 lb
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX4 (G02)M40d | BMWX4 (F26)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,555kg5,633lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 79.0s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.8s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,153km716mi Calculated | 1,117km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,752mm187in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,938mm76in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,621mm64in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,864mm113in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,624mm64in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,430L | 1,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X4 (G02) M40d: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 (F26) 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX4 (G02)M40d | BMWX4 (F26)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.8 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 313 hp 233 kW |
BMW X4 (G02) M40d has 27 hp more than BMW X4 (F26) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X4 (F26) 35d and BMW X4 (G02) M40d: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 4.9 s |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X4 (G02) M40d and BMW X4 (F26) 35d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 1,153 km 716 mi |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 1,117 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.2 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 (F26)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 (F26)35d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X4 (G02) M40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (F26)35d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX4 (G02)M40d | BMWX4 (F26)35d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,153 km 716 mi | 1,117 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X4 (G02) M40d | BMW X4 (F26) 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X4 (G02) M40d
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW X4 (F26) 35d
- Is 160 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























