Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions157 g/km
- Best estimated range1,117 km694 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score91/100
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 65.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 20.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 1,117km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 20.6 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 313 hp 233 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 27 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.8 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 5.3 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has more power, BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 1,117 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 1,117 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 35d
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 409 km (254 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 52 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























