Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4vsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 28d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018
VS

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014

28d

184 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    97 hp/t
    72 kW/t
    10.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,034 km
    643 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
Power
190hp142kW
184hp137kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,958kg4,317lb
1,919kg4,231lb
Gross weight
2,450kg5,401lb
2,341kg5,161lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
88.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
92.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
67.9s
Calculated
76.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
96hp/t72kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,034km643mi
Calculated
859km534mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,668mm184in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,881mm74in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,678mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,810mm111in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,594mm63in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
204mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
67L
CO2 emissions
153g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28dPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d4,000 rpm1,750-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
67.9 s
76.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
184 hp
137 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,958 kg
4,317 lb
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
1,919 kg
4,231 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.4 s
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d8.3 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
96 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,034 km
643 mi
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
859 km
534 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
205 km/h
127 mph
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
184 hp
137 kW
8.3 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,668 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,678 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
96 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,958 kg
4,317 lb
1,919 kg
4,231 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,668 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,678 mm
66.1 in
Range score
1,034 km
643 mi
859 km
534 mi
CO2 score
153 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
96 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 176 km (109 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d

  • Is 39 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) 28d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
28d
28i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428dvsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
28d
3.0d
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428dvsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
28d
20i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428dvsBMWX3 (G01)20i
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
28d
30i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428dvsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
28d
20i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428dvsBMWX3 (G01 LCI)Facelift 202120i
2.0 D4
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
28d
20
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428dvsBMWX3 (G45)20
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 vs BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 28d - car comparison - FastVsFaster