BMW X3 (F25)
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25) 35dvsVolvo XC90 · Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 · Facelift 2007
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 35d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,098 km682 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25)35d | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313hp233kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.0s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 81.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,098km682mi Calculated | 602km374mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 4,414cc269cu in |
| Length | 4,648mm183in | 4,798mm189in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,743mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 249L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,837L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25) 35d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 5,950 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25)35d | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 313 hp 233 kW |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 315 hp 235 kW |
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 has 2 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 35d and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 5.8 s |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 7.3 s |
Although Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 has more power, BMW X3 (F25) 35d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 35d and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 35d and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 7.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 1,098 km 682 mi |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 602 km 374 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 315 hp 235 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
| 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25) 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25)35d | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp 233 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,098 km 682 mi | 602 km 374 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 249 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25) 35d | Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 23.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 3,491 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25) 35d
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 7.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 497 km (309 mi) more estimated range
- Has 301 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
- Has 2 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























