BMW X3 (F25)
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25) 35dvsVolkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touareg II (7P)
4.2 TDI V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 35d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,098 km682 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25)35d | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313hp233kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,297kg5,064lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,920kg6,437lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 25.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 348Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,098km682mi Calculated | 934km580mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 4,134cc252cu in |
| Length | 4,648mm183in | 4,795mm189in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,709mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,893mm114in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | 1,656mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,676mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 580L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,642L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25) 35d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25)35d | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 25.3 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 313 hp 233 kW |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8 has 27 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 35d and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 2,297 kg 5,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 5.8 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 5.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8 has more power, BMW X3 (F25) 35d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 35d and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 1,098 km 682 mi |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 934 km 580 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25) 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25)35d | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp 233 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 2,297 kg 5,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,098 km 682 mi | 934 km 580 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25) 35d | Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25) 35d
- Is 447 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 4.2 TDI V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























