BMW X6 (E71)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (E71) 50ivsBMW X3 (F25) 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25)
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 35d
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,098 km682 mi
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X6 (E71) 50i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful407 hp304 kW
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (E71)50i | BMWX3 (F25)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 407hp304kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Gross weight | 2,790kg6,151lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.1s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km423mi Calculated | 1,098km682mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,648mm183in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 292g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (E71) 50i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25) 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (E71)50i | BMWX3 (F25)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.1 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 407 hp 304 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 313 hp 233 kW |
BMW X6 (E71) 50i has 94 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 50i: 94 hp (70 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 5.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 50i and BMW X3 (F25) 35d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 50i: 6.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 680 km 423 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 1,098 km 682 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 407 hp 304 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)35d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25) 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)50i | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)35d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (E71)50i | BMWX3 (F25)35d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 407 hp 304 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 423 mi | 1,098 km 682 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 292 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (E71) 50i | BMW X3 (F25) 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (E71) 50i
- Has 94 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (F25) 35d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Uses 6.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 418 km (260 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 130 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























