Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) · Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6vsBMW X3 (F25) 30d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25)
30d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 30d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,800 kg3,968 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,117 km694 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMWX3 (F25)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 27.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | 1,117km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,536mm179in | 4,648mm183in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,669mm66in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,597mm63in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 188mm7in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25) 30d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMWX3 (F25)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 27.8 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 258 hp 192 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 has 7 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 30d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 30d and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 6.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 6.2 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 has more power, BMW X3 (F25) 30d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 30d and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 30d and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 930 km 578 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 1,117 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)30d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)30d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMWX3 (F25)30d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | 1,117 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 | BMW X3 (F25) 30d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW X3 (F25) 30d
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 187 km (116 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























