BMW X3 (F25)
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25) 28ivsVolkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touareg II (7P)
3.6 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score83/100
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25)28i | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 2,103kg4,636lb |
| Gross weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,800kg6,173lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 103.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 39.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km463mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,597cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,648mm183in | 4,795mm189in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,709mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,893mm114in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,656mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | 1,676mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 580L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,642L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25) 28i: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25)28i | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 39.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6 has 22 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 2,103 kg 4,636 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 7.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6 has more power, BMW X3 (F25) 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 744 km 463 mi |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW | 7.8 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25)28i | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 2,103 kg 4,636 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 463 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25) 28i | Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Is 358 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























