BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 40dvsBMW X3 (F25) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,790kg6,151lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.4s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 893km555mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,648mm183in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 5,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.4 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d has 61 hp more than BMW X3 (F25) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 6.6 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and BMW X3 (F25) 28i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 893 km 555 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | BMWX3 (F25)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 893 km 555 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d | BMW X3 (F25) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 240 km (149 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Is 390 kg lighter
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























