BMW X3 (G01)
Car comparison
BMW X3 (G01) M40dvsBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (G01) M40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions172 g/km
- Best estimated range1,046 km650 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score89/100
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (G01)M40d | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,385kg5,258lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,046km650mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,716mm186in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,676mm66in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,864mm113in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 172g/km | 208g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (G01) M40d: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (G01)M40d | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 326 hp 243 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW X3 (G01) M40d has 40 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d and BMW X3 (G01) M40d: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 4.9 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (G01) M40d and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (G01) M40d and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 1,046 km 650 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 326 hp 243 kW | 4.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (G01) M40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (G01)M40d | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (G01)M40d | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,046 km 650 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 172 g/km | 208 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (G01) M40d | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (G01) M40d
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 187 km (116 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d
- Is 20 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























