BMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
Car comparison
BMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 3.0sivsBMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
3.0sd
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,037 km644 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score89/100
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 315Nm232lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 81.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 40.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 663km412mi Calculated | 1,037km644mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,853mm73in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,795mm110in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,576mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 40.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 272 hp 203 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd has 14 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si and BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 7.2 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 663 km 412 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 1,037 km 644 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si | BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 663 km 412 mi | 1,037 km 644 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si | BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0si
- Is 445 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 265 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 373 km (232 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























