BMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
Car comparison
BMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 3.0sdvsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions198 g/km
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.2s Calculated | 29.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 770km479mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,853mm73in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,795mm110in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 232g/km | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.2 s | 29.4 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 286 hp 213 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d has 20 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 6.6 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 6.6 s |
Although BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d has more power, BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 770 km 479 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0sd | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 770 km 479 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 232 g/km | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 3.0sd
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 363 km (226 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























