Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSIvsBMW X2 (F39) M35i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

R 2.0 TSI

300 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2021
VS

BMW X2 (F39)

M35i

306 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) M35i

  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    859 km
    534 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,497 kg
    3,300 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    200 hp/t
    149 kW/t
    5.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIBMWX2 (F39)M35i
Power
300hp224kW
306hp228kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,497kg3,300lb
1,610kg3,549lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
2,190kg4,828lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
53.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
55.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.0s
0-200 km/h
15.9s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
4.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.9s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
859km534mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,241mm167in
4,360mm172in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,824mm72in
Height
1,562mm61in
1,526mm60in
Wheelbase
2,595mm102in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,547mm61in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,555mm61in
1,572mm62in
Ground clearance-
182mm7in
Trunk volume
392L
470L
Max trunk volume
1,237L
1,355L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
61L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSIBMW X2 (F39) M35iPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • BMW X2 (F39) M35i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI-2,000-5,200 rpm5,450 rpm
BMWX2 (F39)M35i5,000-6,250 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIBMWX2 (F39)M35i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
4.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.9 s
16.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
181 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
306 hp
228 kW

BMW X2 (F39) M35i has 6 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) M35i: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
1,497 kg
3,300 lb
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
1,610 kg
3,549 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI4.9 s
BMWX2 (F39)M35i5.0 s

Although BMW X2 (F39) M35i has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) M35i: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) M35i and Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
714 km
444 mi
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
859 km
534 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
300 hp
224 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
306 hp
228 kW
5.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,241 mm
167.0 in
Height
1,562 mm
61.5 in
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) M35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
4.9 s
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
5.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSI
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)M35i
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIBMWX2 (F39)M35i
Power
300 hp
224 kW
306 hp
228 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,497 kg
3,300 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,241 mm
167.0 in
Height
1,562 mm
61.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
859 km
534 mi
Trunk score
392 L
13.8 cu ft
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSIBMW X2 (F39) M35i
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI

  • Is 113 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW X2 (F39) M35i

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 78 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI
BMW X2 (F39) M35i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R 2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 2022R 2.0 TSI
M35i
M35i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX2 (U10)M35i
R 2.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
M35i
40i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX7 (G07)40i
R 2.0 TSI
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI
M35i
JCW 2.0
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0
R 2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
M35i
35i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i
R 2.0 TSI
530 V6
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021530 V6
M35i
35i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsBMWX6 (F16)35i
R 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IR 2.0 TSIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
M35i
VZ 2.0 TSI
VS
BMWX2 (F39)M35ivsCupraFormentorVZ 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen T-Roc I R 2.0 TSI vs BMW X2 (F39) M35i - car comparison - FastVsFaster