BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) M35ivsJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) M35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight190 hp/t142 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score88/100
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Largest trunk601 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)M35i | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,877kg4,138lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 86.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 28.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 859km534mi Calculated | 691km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,648mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,624mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 601L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,386L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) M35i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)M35i | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 28.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) M35i has 6 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and BMW X2 (F39) M35i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,877 kg 4,138 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 5.0 s |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) M35i and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) M35i and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 859 km 534 mi |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 691 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) M35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)M35i | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,877 kg 4,138 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 859 km 534 mi | 691 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 601 L 21.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) M35i | Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) M35i
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 267 kg lighter
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 168 km (105 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 131 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























