Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDIvsBMW X2 (F39) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted235 km/h146 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,850kg6,283lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 109.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,904mm114in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 173g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | - | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 7.5 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI | BMWX2 (F39)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 235 km/h146 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 173 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI | BMW X2 (F39) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 3.0 V6 TDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 136 km (85 mi) more estimated range
- Has 340 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Is 450 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























