BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 65.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 25d has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 6.3 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) 25d has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)25d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 25d | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























