Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250vsBMW X2 (F39) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 718km446mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,430L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 5,800 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 25d has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.7 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 718 km 446 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | BMWX2 (F39)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 718 km 446 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 | BMW X2 (F39) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 282 km (175 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























