Car comparison

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsBMW X2 (F39) 25d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

2.0 TSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

BMW X2 (F39)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Lightest
    1,481 kg
    3,265 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentor2.0 TSIBMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
245hp183kW
231hp172kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,481kg3,265lb
1,620kg3,571lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
2,170kg4,784lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
70.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
25.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
633km393mi
Calculated
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,450mm175in
4,360mm172in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,824mm72in
Height
1,528mm60in
1,526mm60in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,563mm62in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,562mm61in
Trunk volume
450L
470L
Max trunk volume-
1,355L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIBMW X2 (F39) 25dPowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI5,250-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWX2 (F39)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentor2.0 TSIBMWX2 (F39)25d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
25.6 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
BMWX2 (F39)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1,481 kg
3,265 lb
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,620 kg
3,571 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
BMWX2 (F39)25d
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI6.8 s
BMWX2 (F39)25d6.6 s

Although Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI has more power, BMW X2 (F39) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 2.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
BMWX2 (F39)25d
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
633 km
393 mi
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,000 km
621 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.8 s
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMWX2 (F39)25d
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentor2.0 TSIBMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
245 hp
183 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.6 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,481 kg
3,265 lb
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Range score
633 km
393 mi
1,000 km
621 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor 2.0 TSIBMW X2 (F39) 25d
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Is 139 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 367 km (228 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
25d
M35i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)25dvsBMWX2 (U10)M35i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
25d
25i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)25dvsBMWX1 (F48)25i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
25d
30d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)25dvsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
25d
28i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)25dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
25d
30d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)25dvsBMWX6 (F16)30d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
25d
GLB 250
VS
BMWX2 (F39)25dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI vs BMW X2 (F39) 25d - car comparison - FastVsFaster