BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score88/100
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 77.4s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 147g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 850 km 528 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 147 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 221 km (138 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























