BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.0s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 984km611mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.0 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.4 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 984 km 611 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 984 km 611 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























