BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 28d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
28d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,919kg4,231lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,341kg5,161lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.1s Calculated | 76.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t72kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 984km611mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,668mm184in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,678mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.1 s | 76.0 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 8 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 984 km 611 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.3 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 984 km 611 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 379 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























