Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 20i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2018
VS

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014

20i

184 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    984 km
    611 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)20iBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
Power
192hp143kW
184hp137kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,735kg3,825lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
2,325kg5,126lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
74.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
87.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
33.0s
Calculated
53.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
984km611mi
Calculated
931km578mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,657mm183in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,881mm74in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,661mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,810mm111in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,632mm64in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
204mm8in
Trunk volume
470L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
67L
CO2 emissions-
168g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 20iBMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20iPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
  • BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i5,000-6,250 rpm1,250-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)20iBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.0 s
53.2 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
184 hp
137 kW

BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 8 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
1,735 kg
3,825 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
224 km/h
139 mph
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i7.4 s
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
984 km
611 mi
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
931 km
578 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
184 hp
137 kW
8.2 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)20iBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.2 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Range score
984 km
611 mi
931 km
578 mi
CO2 score
-
168 g/km
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 20iBMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) 20i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i vs BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 20i - car comparison - FastVsFaster