BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,325kg5,126lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 87.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.0s Calculated | 53.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 984km611mi Calculated | 931km578mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.0 s | 53.2 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 8 hp more than BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 984 km 611 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 931 km 578 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 984 km 611 mi | 931 km 578 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 20i
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























