Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200vsBMW X2 (F39) 18d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
18d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.1 s
- Fastest top speed207 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best practicality score87/100
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.7s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 85.0s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 59.6s Calculated | 62.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 839km521mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 182mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 18d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,620-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 59.6 s | 62.8 s |
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 14.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 has 13 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 18d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 18d and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 9.1 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 9.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 18d and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 839 km 521 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.1 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 18d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200 | BMWX2 (F39)18d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 839 km 521 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 | BMW X2 (F39) 18d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























