BMW X1 (U11)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (U11) 20dvsBMW X2 (U10) 18d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (U10)
18d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (U11) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score92/100
BMW X2 (U10) 18d
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight94 hp/t70 kW/t10.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (U11)20d | BMWX2 (U10)18d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 98.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 58.6s Calculated | 59.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 89hp/t66kW/t40hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,500mm177in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,642mm65in | 1,590mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,592mm63in | 1,674mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,593mm63in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 205mm8in | 207mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,545L | 1,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (U11) 20d: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (U10) 18d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (U11)20d | BMWX2 (U10)18d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 58.6 s | 59.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 8.6 s |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (U11) 20d and BMW X2 (U10) 18d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 89 hp/t 66 kW/t 11.3 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 833 km 518 mi |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (U10)18d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (U10)18d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (U11) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (U11)20d | 89 hp/t 66 kW/t 11.3 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (U10)18d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (U11)20d | BMWX2 (U10)18d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 89 hp/t 66 kW/t 11.3 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (U11) 20d | BMW X2 (U10) 18d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (U11) 20d
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW X2 (U10) 18d
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























