Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 25ivsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

25i

231 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Largest trunk
    615 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

BMW X1 (F48) 25i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    150 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    152 g/km

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)25iVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
231hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,720kg3,792lb
Gross weight
2,140kg4,718lb
2,350kg5,181lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
68.0s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
924km574mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,486mm177in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,673mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,677mm105in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
615L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,655L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
60L
CO2 emissions
152g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 25iVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 25i: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)25i5,000-6,000 rpm1,250-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)25iVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
28.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
231 hp
172 kW
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI has 9 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25i and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,720 kg
3,792 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
235 km/h
146 mph
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i6.5 s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.5 s

Although Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 25i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
924 km
574 mi
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)25i
231 hp
172 kW
6.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)25i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)25i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)25i
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)25i
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)25iVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Range score
924 km
574 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
152 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 25iVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25i

  • Is 180 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 15 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 110 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 25i
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

25i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
25i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX1 (E84)28i
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
25i
23i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX1 (U11)23i
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
25i
25d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
25i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
2.0 BiTDI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
25i
30d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX6 (F16)30d
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
BMW X1 (F48) 25i vs Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster