Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 25dvsPorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Porsche Macan I (95B)

2.0

237 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,575 kg
    3,472 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)25dPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
231hp172kW
237hp177kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,575kg3,472lb
2,025kg4,464lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,445kg5,390lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
69.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
85.7s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
981km609mi
Calculated
867km539mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,681mm184in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,624mm64in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,807mm111in
Front track
1,561mm61in
-
Rear track
1,562mm61in
-
Ground clearance
183mm7in
-
Trunk volume
505L
500L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,500L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
65L
CO2 emissions
137g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 25dPorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 25d: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.05,000-6,800 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)25dPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
35.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
231 hp
172 kW
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
237 hp
177 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 6 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2,025 kg
4,464 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
235 km/h
146 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
223 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d6.6 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.06.9 s

Although Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
981 km
609 mi
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
867 km
539 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
237 hp
177 kW
6.9 s
223 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,681 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)25d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.6 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)25d
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)25dPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
237 hp
177 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,681 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Range score
981 km
609 mi
867 km
539 mi
CO2 score
137 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 25dPorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25d

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 450 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Has 6 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 25d
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25d vs Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster